Know where the number came from.

Every Azure cost explained. Every finding owned.

Cloudivence brings Azure spending, application ownership and security evidence together, and traces every figure and decision back to its source.

Request a pilot Explore the demo

The demo runs on Fictive Corp, a synthetic company: read only, an access link by email. Or read about the platform

Read only on Azure
No agent to install
Made in Belgium by GenioCT

The FinOps overview of the Fictive Corp demo: September 2026 cost, the month end figure, budget pace, the unallocated share and a twelve month cost trend split into final and provisional months.

Three questions a dashboard does not answer

Why does the invoice not match the portal?

The CSP invoice and Azure cost data rarely agree line for line. Someone has to show where they differ.

Who answers for this cost?

Teams change and shared platforms serve everyone. Without dated ownership, last year's figures move with every new mapping.

Who answers for this finding?

Defender lists what is wrong. It does not say which application it affects or what was decided.

Financial governance

From Azure spending to financial accountability

Reconcile the invoice: The CSP invoice is checked against Azure cost every month. A month is final only when its checks pass.
Allocate every cost: Budget lines, applications and owners from one mapping with its history. What has no owner stays visible.
Know what is coming: Budgets against actuals, a month end forecast, and the planned changes behind next year's figure.

Allocation in the Fictive Corp demo: 96.5% of September 2026 allocated, €2.9k unallocated and waiting for a mapping, cost by investment line against its annual budget, and the provenance of each amount.

Financial governance in detail →

Security & assurance

From security findings to accountable decisions

Findings in context: Defender, Azure Policy, access, network, storage and backup state, for the resources the cost belongs to.
Grouped by proof: Findings are grouped only when their source proves they are the same issue, and a person can give each one an owner and a due date.
Controls you can defend: CyberFundamentals and NIS2 controls assessed from that evidence, with attestations and control exceptions kept on file.

Security & assurance in detail →

Security issues in the Fictive Corp demo: 34 open issues, SLA compliance per severity, issues opened this week and resolved issues.

Ownership & evidence

One application, as its owner sees it

Its cost, month by month: Final and provisional months, and the services the application is made of.
What is open on it: The findings on its resources, without searching every subscription.
Who answers for it: Business and technical owner, now and before, and the budget lines it is mapped to.

Ownership and accountability →

The application owner view of Demand forecasting in the Fictive Corp demo: its business and technical owner, €160k this year, two resource groups, five open findings, cost month by month and by service.

The evidence model

Two paths, one owner, one evidence trail

Cost questions and security questions start from the same Azure resources and end with the same owners. Cloudivence keeps that connection, step by step.

Point at a step, or move to it with the keyboard, to see what Cloudivence keeps there.

Invoice. The reseller workbook is stored as received, recomputed from its own formulas and checked before a month becomes final.

Cost data. Azure cost per subscription, resource group, meter and day, matched to the invoice month.

Allocation. Your mapping of resource groups to budget lines, applied as known at month close or restated with today's rules.

Resources. Inventory, tags and configuration, read only, for the same resources the cost belongs to.

Findings. Defender for Cloud, Azure Policy, access, network, storage and backup state, grouped only when they are provably the same issue.

Controls. Requirements assessed from that evidence. A control without evidence stays not assessed and counts against the score.

Owner. The application or budget line, and who answers for it on any given date. Both paths meet here.

Evidence. Every figure and every decision leads back to its source and can be reproduced as it was known at the time.

Trust

Answers you can defend

Read only

Cloudivence reads Azure and changes nothing. No write roles, no agent.

Unknown stays unknown

Missing evidence is shown as missing, never as compliant or as zero.

Owners before dashboards

Every amount and finding leads to the person who answers for it.

Clear about maturity

Available today, assisted pilot or planned: the Trust page says which.

What Cloudivence reads, and why →

How a pilot works

Four steps to a figure you can defend

01 Connect read access. Read roles on the subscriptions you choose.
02 Bring the invoice. Your CSP reseller's monthly workbook, kept as received.
03 Map ownership. Your current spreadsheet, imported as a change set you review.
04 Read, explain and act. Every figure and finding opens on its evidence.

Pilots are assisted today. Invoice reconciliation supports one CSP reseller's workbook format, and others are added as needed. How it works

Try it on your own Azure bill

Pilots run with our help today: we agree the scope and the read access with you, then work through one or two closed months together.

Request a pilot Explore the demo